How The Woman in White Turns Witness Statements Into a Page-Turner

Marian Halcombe takes off her silk gown because it might rustle. She puts on a dark cloak, climbs through a window and edges along the roof of a verandah, where a misplaced foot could knock over a flowerpot. Below her, Sir Percival Glyde and Count Fosco are about to talk. We know how close she comes to being heard because she writes it all down.

That scene shows why The Woman in White moves so quickly for a novel built from written accounts. Wilkie Collins gives each witness access to a different part of the mystery. Then he changes narrators at moments when the person we most want to hear from can no longer tell us what happened. Even the act of writing something down can put a character in danger.

This article discusses the Blackwater Park diary sequence and leaves the solution and ending unspoiled.

Walter Hartright gives us a question the next witness can answer

In the preamble, Walter compares the story to a court case told by “more than one witness.” He’ll write about events he experienced himself and give way when someone else is better placed to speak. The promise sounds orderly. His encounter with the woman in white shows how unsettling it can be to have only one person’s account.

On a road outside London, the woman asks Walter how to get to the city. He helps her find a cab. Only after she leaves does he hear that a woman dressed in white has escaped from an asylum. Collins puts those two moments in a specific order. We meet someone who needs help before we hear the official-sounding reason she’s being pursued. By the time Walter reaches Limmeridge House, we have a reason to pay attention to anyone who can tell us something about her that the men on the road couldn’t.

Marian’s diary makes the time it takes to gather evidence matter

The suspense on the verandah starts before Sir Percival and Fosco say anything worth overhearing. Marian has five windows to pass. One is lit. She has to judge where the flowerpots are by touch and wait to hear whether the men will sit where their voices can reach her. Those details give the conversation a physical cost. If one of them moves his chair or if someone looks out a window, she may hear only half of what she came for.

The scene gains a second deadline when Marian sits down to record it. She writes through the early hours after getting soaked in the rain. As her fever worsens, she loses track of the clock and struggles to make out her own words. An editorial note says her last lines have become illegible. Collins lets us follow her effort to make a usable record right up to the point where the page fails her.

Fosco turns a change of narrator into a threat

The next page of Marian’s diary is in a different hand. Fosco has read it, and he leaves a postscript praising her courage, her memory and the accuracy of her account of the conversation. His compliments are unnerving partly because they’re so specific. He knows exactly how much she heard.

This is the handoff that makes the whole device click. We’ve just spent pages hoping Marian can listen without being discovered. Fosco now knows what she recorded and what she made of it. He claims the diary merely confirms a plan he had already made. With Marian too ill to respond, we have to carry that claim into the next account and decide how much weight to give it.

The quieter witnesses make the gaps harder to ignore

The housekeeper at Blackwater Park, Eliza Michelson, brings a different kind of attention to the story. Her account follows the work of tending to Marian and the arrangements made around her sickroom. She’s confident in her judgments about good nursing and proper conduct. The reader, having seen Fosco’s postscript, has reason to be more interested in who has access to the room and what happens when the people caring for Marian are sent elsewhere.

Later, a doctor’s certificate and a brief signed statement enter the record. The certificate supplies a date, an address and a medical cause. The statement describes what a witness personally did. The brisk form of those documents makes them feel conclusive, even though each answers a narrow question. It’s worth slowing down there. Collins has already shown how much can happen between what one person can certify and what the next person actually saw.

That’s the pleasure of reading The Woman in White for the first time. A new statement might clear up a detail and make the surrounding events harder to explain. By the time you reach the next witness, you’re looking for the one thing the last person had no way of knowing.

Primary text — Read Wilkie Collins’s The Woman in White at Project Gutenberg.

Related reading — Why The Moonstone Has So Many Narrators · Why Dracula Feels Like Reading a Case File

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

For an annotated print edition, look for the Penguin Classics paperback of The Woman in White, with an introduction and notes by Matthew Sweet.

Follow us on Instagram and Facebook