1984 Book Review: Why George Orwell’s Classic Is Trending Again

Some books become bigger than their stories. They move beyond the page, enter everyday language and give people a way to describe the world around them. George Orwell’s 1984 is one of those rare novels.

Even people who have never read it recognize phrases such as “Big Brother,” “Thought Police” and “doublethink.” The word “Orwellian” has become shorthand for intrusive surveillance, authoritarian control and the manipulation of truth. Scroll through social media long enough and someone will eventually compare a news story, new technology or political decision to 1984.

That is remarkable for a novel first published in 1949.

More than 75 years later, 1984 is trending again as readers return to books about censorship, surveillance and the fragility of truth. This is not the novel’s first revival. Following the 2024 U.S. election, its Amazon sales reportedly increased by 250 percent. In September 2025, it reached No. 3 on the U.S. Apple Books paid-books chart. Renewed commentary in 2026 has kept Orwell’s warning in the cultural conversation.

The attention changes with each political or technological moment, but the underlying pattern remains the same: when people become anxious about power and truth, they reach for Orwell.

That enduring relevance is a major reason why I believe everyone should read 1984 at least once.

Why Is 1984 Trending Again?

The latest interest in 1984 is part of a much longer cycle. The novel regularly returns to bestseller lists and online conversations during periods of political uncertainty. Readers also connect it to modern debates about digital privacy, artificial intelligence, misinformation, censorship and the amount of personal data collected by governments and corporations.

In 2017, 1984 climbed to the top of Amazon’s bestseller list after the phrase “alternative facts” entered the political conversation. Dystopian books surged again after the 2024 U.S. election, and 1984 continued appearing on major digital bestseller charts in 2025.

That does not mean every modern controversy is literally Orwellian. The term is often used too casually online. However, the novel gives readers a shared vocabulary for discussing real concerns: Who controls information? Can a government change public memory by repeating a falsehood? What happens when people no longer agree on basic facts?

Those questions have not gone away. If anything, social media and rapidly developing technology have made them feel more immediate.

1984 Summary

The novel follows Winston Smith, a low-ranking member of the Party who lives in Oceania, one of three superstates locked in seemingly endless conflict.

Oceania is ruled by the Party and its ever-present leader, Big Brother. His face appears on posters throughout the city beside a warning that has become one of literature’s most recognizable ideas: Big Brother is watching.

Winston works at the Ministry of Truth, but his job has almost nothing to do with preserving the truth. He alters old newspaper articles and public records so the past always agrees with the Party’s current position. If the Party makes an incorrect prediction, Winston changes the historical record until it appears that the Party was right all along. If an ally becomes an enemy, the records are rewritten to suggest that the two sides were always at war.

History is not treated as a collection of facts. It becomes a tool of power.

Winston secretly despises the Party, but even an unspoken rebellious idea can be considered a thoughtcrime. He takes an enormous risk when he begins recording his private thoughts in a diary purchased from Mr. Charrington’s secondhand shop.

His quiet rebellion becomes more dangerous after Julia, a young woman who works in the same ministry, slips him a note. Winston initially distrusts her, but the two begin a forbidden relationship. In a society determined to control loyalty, desire and family life, their intimacy becomes a form of resistance.

For a brief time, Winston believes he has found something honest in a world built on lies. Yet privacy is nearly impossible under constant surveillance, and he cannot know which people or places are truly safe.

The less said about what follows, the better. 1984 is widely known, but its final sections are still most effective when a reader experiences them without every development being revealed in advance.

Orwell Was Ahead of His Time but He Was Not Predicting Smartphones

One of the most fascinating parts of 1984 is how modern some of its fears feel.

Orwell wrote the novel decades before smartphones, social media, targeted advertising or location-tracking apps. Most people now carry a connected device almost everywhere they go. Websites remember searches, apps collect behavioral data and algorithms build detailed pictures of what holds our attention.

It is easy to look at a telescreen and say Orwell predicted the smartphone. That comparison is memorable, but it is also too simple.

Orwell was not designing a technological forecast. He was writing a political warning shaped by totalitarianism, propaganda and the violent history of the first half of the twentieth century. His central concern was not merely that a screen could watch someone. It was that concentrated power could use surveillance, fear and language to destroy a person’s ability to think independently.

Modern technology can connect communities, expand access to knowledge and give ordinary people a public voice. Those benefits are almost entirely absent from Orwell’s world. The resemblance becomes meaningful when technology is used without transparency or when people lose the ability to question those controlling it.

That distinction makes the novel more useful. 1984 should not be treated as a checklist of inventions Orwell “got right.” It is a warning about what tools can become when power faces no meaningful limits.

The Most Frightening Part of 1984 Is the Destruction of Truth

Surveillance receives most of the attention, but I think Orwell’s treatment of truth is even more disturbing.

Winston’s work at the Ministry of Truth shows how easily public memory can be attacked. A lie does not need to be proved if all contradictory evidence can be erased. The Party does not simply want citizens to repeat its version of events in public. It wants them to accept that version internally, even when it contradicts what they remember.

This is where “doublethink” becomes so important. A person must hold two incompatible ideas and accept both when the Party demands it. The goal is not ordinary dishonesty. It is the destruction of any stable reality outside political authority.

Orwell also explores control through Newspeak, a language designed to shrink over time. If the words needed to express rebellion disappear, the Party believes rebellious thought will eventually become impossible.

That idea is chilling because language does more than communicate what we already think. It gives shape to thought. A smaller vocabulary can mean fewer ways to describe injustice, challenge authority or imagine a different future.

The Party’s greatest ambition is therefore not to monitor every citizen. It is to make independent judgment itself impossible.

Freedom, Love and Individuality

1984 is often described as a political novel, but its emotional power comes from Winston’s attempt to remain an individual.

His diary matters because it contains thoughts that belong to him. His interest in ordinary objects from the past represents a desire for continuity and memory. His relationship with Julia matters because it creates a private loyalty that competes with the Party.

These actions might look small in another novel. In Oceania, they are revolutionary.

The Party recognizes that private relationships create bonds it cannot completely control. Love gives people someone else to value. Memory gives them a standard against which official claims can be judged. Personal language allows them to name experiences the state would rather erase.

That is why the book’s lack of freedom is more terrifying than its cameras. The characters do not merely lose privacy. They risk losing their identities, their relationships and even confidence in their own minds.

Is 1984 Still Worth Reading?

Yes. 1984 remains worth reading because its warnings are broader than any one political party, country or period in history.

The novel can be bleak, and parts of it are more interested in political theory than fast-moving plot. Readers looking for an action-heavy dystopian thriller may find the middle section slower than expected. Orwell sometimes pauses the story to explain how Oceania’s system works and why its contradictions help preserve power.

However, those ideas are also the reason the book has endured.

The novel asks readers to consider how truth is established, why free thought matters and how fear can persuade people to surrender their judgment. Its world is extreme, but the mechanisms Orwell examines, repetition, scapegoating, surveillance, restricted language and rewritten history, remain recognizable.

I would not call 1984 a perfect prediction of modern life. In many ways, the world is freer, more connected and more complicated than Oceania. Treating every disliked rule or content-moderation decision as proof that “we are living in 1984” weakens Orwell’s argument.

The better question is not whether Orwell predicted our exact future. It is whether his novel helps us recognize dangerous patterns before they reach their most extreme form.

It does.

Final Verdict

1984 has earned its place among the most important novels ever published. It is more than a dystopian story about cameras and Big Brother. It is a novel about power, language, memory, intimacy and the vulnerability of truth.

Its renewed popularity makes sense. Every generation encounters new technologies and political conflicts, then returns to Orwell to ask whether the boundaries of freedom are shifting. Some comparisons are exaggerated, but the fact that readers continue making them shows how deeply the novel has shaped public thought.

I definitely recommend reading 1984 at least once. It is unsettling, intelligent and difficult to forget. Even if you disagree with some of Orwell’s conclusions, the novel will make you think more carefully about who controls information and why the freedom to question authority matters.

At the very least, you will finally understand why the internet never stops referencing Big Brother and why 1984 keeps trending again.

Read 1984 by George Orwell

Disclosure: This is an affiliate link. Books of Brilliance may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is 1984 about?

1984 follows Winston Smith, a man living under a totalitarian government that controls information, language and personal relationships. Winston secretly questions the Party and begins searching for truth and human connection in a society built on surveillance and fear.

Why is 1984 trending again?

Readers repeatedly return to 1984 during debates about surveillance, censorship, misinformation and political power. The novel experienced renewed sales attention after the 2024 U.S. election, appeared near the top of the U.S. Apple Books chart in September 2025 and continued generating new cultural commentary in 2026.

Is 1984 difficult to read?

The prose is generally accessible, but the book contains bleak subject matter and sections devoted to political ideas. Most readers can follow the story easily, although its themes may require time and reflection.

What does “Orwellian” mean?

“Orwellian” usually describes an oppressive situation involving authoritarian control, intrusive surveillance, deceptive political language or the manipulation of truth. The term is inspired by ideas found throughout Orwell’s writing, especially 1984.

Follow us on Instagram and Facebook!