Agatha Christie has written so many clever mysteries that it can sometimes be difficult to explain why one particular novel stands out. But The ABC Murders immediately separates itself from many of her other books with one simple but brilliant idea: a killer appears to be choosing victims alphabetically.

I loved the ABC angle of this novel. It gives the mystery a completely different feel from the traditional country-house murders and isolated groups of suspects that Christie is famous for. Instead of waiting for Hercule Poirot to discover a murder, the killer seems to be challenging him directly, sending letters that announce where the next crime will happen.

It is clever, unusual, and another great example of just how creative Agatha Christie could be. Even after reading a number of her novels, I am constantly impressed by how rarely her mysteries feel repetitive. The ABC Murders is one of the best examples of Christie taking the basic murder-mystery formula and finding an entirely new way to play with it.

The ABC Murders Summary

Hercule Poirot receives a strange anonymous letter warning him that something is going to happen in Andover.

The letter is signed simply ABC.

At first, there isn’t enough information to know whether the message should be taken seriously. Then a woman named Alice Ascher is murdered in Andover. Near her body is an ABC railway guide.

Another letter soon arrives.

This time, the killer appears to be moving on to the letter B.

Poirot and Captain Hastings realize that they may be dealing with someone committing a carefully planned series of murders in alphabetical order. The locations, victims, and clues all seem connected by the alphabet, and the killer appears determined to stay one step ahead of Poirot.

What follows is one of Christie’s most unusual mysteries as Poirot tries to understand not only who the murderer is, but why someone would construct such an elaborate pattern in the first place.

The ABC Concept Makes This Mystery Stand Out

The strongest part of the novel for me is easily the ABC setup.

It is such a simple idea that you almost wonder why more mystery novels haven’t tried something similar. Christie takes something as ordinary as the alphabet and turns it into the structure for a murder investigation.

Andover. A.

Then another location beginning with B.

Then C.

Once Christie establishes the pattern, there is an immediate sense of urgency. Poirot and the police know another murder may be coming, but knowing the next letter does not necessarily tell them enough to stop it.

That gives The ABC Murders a different rhythm than many Christie novels. Instead of having one central crime with a fixed group of suspects, the investigation keeps expanding.

There is also the unsettling realization that almost anyone could potentially become the next victim.

I loved that aspect of the book because it makes the mystery feel larger and less predictable.

Agatha Christie Shows Just How Creative She Can Be

One reason I continue returning to Christie is how inventive she was within a genre that could easily become formulaic.

There are only so many basic ingredients in a murder mystery: victim, murderer, detective, suspects, clues and motives.

Yet Christie repeatedly finds ways to rearrange those ingredients.

Murder on the Orient Express traps suspects together on a train.

And Then There Were None isolates its characters on an island.

The Murder of Roger Ackroyd plays with the expectations of detective fiction itself.

And The ABC Murders turns the alphabet into the foundation of a potential serial murder case.

That variety is a big reason why reading Christie never feels like simply reading the same mystery over and over again with different character names.

She understands how to give each case its own identity.

The alphabetical killings aren’t just a gimmick added to make the title memorable, either. Christie builds the entire mystery around the pattern and, as you would expect from her, forces you to question what that pattern actually means.

Hercule Poirot Is Perfect for This Case

The novel also works because the murderer appears to challenge Poirot personally.

Poirot is used to walking into a crime scene and reconstructing what has already happened. Here, someone is essentially telling him that another murder is coming.

That changes the dynamic.

There is an element of competition between detective and murderer, and Poirot’s ego makes him particularly suited for that kind of story.

But Poirot doesn’t solve crimes simply by finding fingerprints or following footprints. His greatest weapon has always been his understanding of people.

That becomes particularly important in The ABC Murders.

While everyone else understandably focuses on the alphabetical pattern, Poirot continues asking the questions Christie detectives ask best: Why?

Why these victims?

Why these locations?

Why send letters?

And why make sure everyone notices the ABC connection?

Those questions gradually become more important than the pattern itself.

Agatha Christie’s Books Never Feel Old

Something that continually surprises me when reading Christie is how well her best novels hold up.

Of course, the technology and social setting belong to another era. Nobody is checking security cameras, tracking a suspect’s smartphone, or waiting for DNA results.

But the actual experience of reading the mystery rarely feels outdated.

That is because Christie built her stories around human behavior.

Jealousy doesn’t become obsolete.

Neither do greed, fear, resentment, revenge or desperation.

And neither does the desire to figure out a puzzle before the detective reveals the answer.

That is why The ABC Murders still works so well. The machinery surrounding the investigation may be old-fashioned, but the storytelling doesn’t feel old.

The concept is the kind of premise that could easily anchor a modern crime thriller today.

The Mystery Keeps You Guessing

Christie’s best trick has always been making readers believe they understand what sort of story they are reading.

Then she quietly changes the rules.

The ABC Murders does this particularly well because the premise seems so obvious.

Someone is killing people alphabetically.

Therefore, the mystery should simply be about discovering the identity of the alphabetical murderer.

But Christie wouldn’t be Christie if things were quite that straightforward.

The fun comes from examining the clues and trying to determine which details actually matter.

I found myself constantly reconsidering what Christie was doing, which is exactly what I want from one of her mysteries.

You aren’t merely reading the story.

You’re competing with her.

And she usually wins.

Is The ABC Murders Worth Reading?

This a novel unlike any other boy Christie.

The ABC Murders is one of the Agatha Christie novels I would easily recommend, especially to readers who want something slightly different from her traditional murder mysteries.

I loved the alphabetical murder concept because it gives the book its own identity immediately. More importantly, Christie actually delivers on the premise rather than relying on it as a gimmick.

The novel showcases exactly why she remains such an important mystery writer. Christie could take something incredibly simple, the ABCs, and build an elaborate mystery around it that keeps readers questioning what is really happening.

And that may be what I enjoy most about reading her work.

Her books don’t feel old.

They still feel clever.

They still make you suspicious of everyone.

And they still make you want to beat Hercule Poirot to the solution.

Good luck with that.

Rating: 4.5/5

For anyone exploring Agatha Christie’s bibliography, The ABC Murders deserves a spot near the top of the reading list.

Follow us on Instagram and Facebook 


Discover more from Books of Brilliance

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.