Inspector Alan Grant has a broken leg, a pile of books he doesn’t want to read, and a portrait he can’t stop looking at. In Josephine Tey’s The Daughter of Time, the Scotland Yard detective becomes curious about Richard III, the king long accused of ordering the deaths of his two nephews. The face he sees is hard to reconcile with the villain he knows from history. That first impression gives him a question worth pursuing from his hospital bed: how did the story of Richard’s guilt become so familiar?
What draws me to Tey’s setup is how little Grant has to go on. A detective stuck in bed has to ask whether a story everybody knows can hold up under the kind of scrutiny he’d give any witness.
Why a portrait sends Grant looking for evidence
A face can tell Grant what he expects to see in a villain. It can tell him very little about what happened in 1483. Tey makes that gap part of the fun. Grant catches himself doubting a story he has heard for years, and readers get to watch his own hunch come under pressure as the inquiry develops.
The boys at the center of the case were Edward V and his younger brother Richard, Duke of York. They disappeared from public view after entering the Tower of London in 1483, the year their uncle took the throne as Richard III. Their fate remains a matter of historical debate.
How Grant cross-examines the historical record
Grant can’t go to the archives himself, so he relies on help, including an American researcher who tracks down material for him. The hospital room becomes the place where they put the accounts side by side. When did a claim first appear? Was its author close enough to the events to know what happened? If two writers tell the same story, did they hear it independently or is one repeating the other?
That last question gives the novel some of its best turns. An accusation can look stronger every time it appears in print, even if all those versions go back to a single account. Tey gets suspense out of watching Grant work backward from the version everyone knows to the people who first told it.
Where Tey’s mystery meets an open historical question
The novel makes a case for reconsidering Richard’s reputation. The fate of the princes remains unresolved, and historians continue to weigh evidence about who may have been responsible. The most interesting thing to watch in the novel is how quickly Grant can change the weight of a familiar story by asking who had the chance to see what it describes.
A spoiler-light way to read The Daughter of Time
Pick one accusation and follow it through the book. Each time it comes up, ask who is making the claim and how they could know it. Then pay attention to what Grant does when he finds an account that suits his own theory. His first impression of Richard was a hunch, too, and it’s worth holding the detective to the same standard he sets for his sources.
If you enjoy mysteries that ask you to weigh testimony for yourself, browse our guide to classic mystery books.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Find The Daughter of Time on Amazon!
Follow us on Instagram and Facebook
Discover more from Books of Brilliance
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.





