100 Years Later, The Murder of Roger Ackroyd Is Even Better on a Reread

The first time through The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, you want to know what happened in the study. The second time, it’s worth watching how quickly Agatha Christie gets you out of the room. A glance back, a hand on the door, and the scene is over before you’ve thought to ask whether it should be.

Christie published the novel in 1926, and a century later it still rewards the reader who goes back to page one. Once you know the solution, you can watch Christie make ordinary things do double duty. A precise time sounds reassuring. A familiar voice seems as good as a sighting. A village doctor who makes fun of his sister’s gossip seems like a sensible person to have on hand. The pleasure of a reread is noticing how readily you make those judgments yourself.

The centenary also gives the British Library’s Agatha Christie: A World of Mystery an especially good companion read. The exhibition opened October 30 and runs through June 20, 2027. Our guide looks at the objects and settings that illuminate how Christie worked.

If you’re still deciding whether to read the novel, start with our review of The Murder of Roger Ackroyd and save the rest of this essay for after you finish.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Want a copy you can mark up? Find a paperback of The Murder of Roger Ackroyd on Amazon.

Spoiler warning. The rest of this essay discusses the murderer, the method, and the final chapter.

The ten minutes Christie lets you skip

In Chapter IV, Dr. James Sheppard tells us Mrs. Ferrars’s letter arrives at 8:40 and that he leaves Roger Ackroyd at about 8:50, with the letter still unread. The first time through, the letter has all your attention. It can expose a blackmailer, and Ackroyd insists on reading it alone. So when Sheppard leaves, the question you carry out of the room is whether Ackroyd will open it. There’s a better question sitting between those two times. What did Sheppard do while he was still inside?

In the final chapter, Sheppard imagines putting a row of stars after the first sentence of the passage. A visible break would make the missing time look like something Christie wanted us to notice. As printed, one sentence follows the other so easily that ten minutes feel like a continuous account. Sheppard even remembers pausing at the door to think whether he’s left anything undone. On a first read, that sounds like a doctor second-guessing himself after an uncomfortable conversation. On a second, it’s a man checking his work.

The detail I’d underline is the unread letter. Sheppard gives us one fact that remains true from the beginning of the interval to the end. It creates the impression that the whole room has stayed as he found it. Meanwhile, the room has become a crime scene.

A voice can be real and still give you the wrong time

At 9:30, Ackroyd’s voice is heard from the study. The natural conclusion is that he’s alive at 9:30. Once Poirot brings up the Dictaphone, even Raymond assumes Ackroyd must have been speaking into it then. He’s willing to reconsider who was in the room, while the time itself still seems settled.

That’s the moment I’d slow down for on a reread. Sheppard has set the machine to play a recording at half past nine. The voice is genuinely Ackroyd’s, just as the times in Sheppard’s account are real. Both pieces of evidence invite the same mistake. We assume the voice and the living man must occupy the same moment, just as we assume two adjacent sentences tell us everything important that happened between them.

The armchair makes that trick wonderfully physical. Sheppard pulls it out to hide the Dictaphone from the doorway. Once you know what it conceals, a piece of furniture you could skim past becomes evidence that someone planned how the room would look to the next person who entered it.

Start again at Caroline’s breakfast table

The ending sends you straight back to the opening, where Sheppard explains that his sister Caroline can find out almost anything while sitting at home. It’s an affectionate joke, and it does a surprising amount of work. He gets to sound observant and a little put upon. Caroline’s curiosity looks like the thing likely to make trouble.

Knowing what he’s done gives that relationship a different charge. Caroline opens the novel asking questions about Mrs. Ferrars, the very person whose secrets could expose him. Her habit of gathering information through other people makes her easy to laugh at and difficult for Sheppard to manage. He can choose what he tells his sister. He has much less control over what reaches her breakfast table.

It’s still funny the second time. That’s part of what makes it uncomfortable. Sheppard’s wit and his easy familiarity with village life are exactly what make him such good company before you know how carefully he’s choosing his words.

If you only have time to revisit one scene, read the end of Chapter IV and then the confession. Pay attention to where your eye moves after 8:40. Christie gives the first-time reader a letter worth following and leaves the returning reader ten minutes worth staying for.

Follow us on Instagram and Facebook