The Witch by Freida McFadden: 5 Clues You Might Have Missed

Major spoilers ahead for both timelines in The Witch.

Freida McFadden’s The Witch recently topped a national bestseller chart: Publishers Weekly ranked it No. 1 overall on its October 19, 2026, list. With the mystery reaching more readers, its quieter details deserve another look.

The most revealing clues concern names, access and contradictions. Some foreshadow the deception; others give Julia something she can actually investigate. Here are five details worth revisiting, with the evidence distinguished from what it suggests.

For the full resolution of both timelines, read our The Witch ending explained.

1. Gram Uses the Name Celia Almost Immediately

In Chapter 4, Gram calls Julia Celia. Julia treats the unfamiliar name as another reason to worry about her grandmother’s memory.

That moment plants a name before Julia understands its significance. On a reread, the question becomes: why does Celia belong in Gram’s memories of this house? The slip introduces a lead, although it does not, by itself, identify the woman posing as Ethel.

2. Ethel’s Ghost Story Includes a Rule Against Digging

In the same chapter, Ethel warns Julia against disturbing Caroline’s supposed grave. She presents the restriction as something Caroline herself would enforce.

Read as foreshadowing, this is unusually useful to a living person protecting a secret. The story does more than make the garden frightening: it discourages investigation. That practical effect makes the warning suspicious, even before Julia can establish what lies underground.

3. The Letters Make the Family Timeline Testable

Julia finds unsent letters in which Ethel describes her pregnancy. Comparing the correspondence with her father’s birth leads Julia to suspect that Ethel was his biological mother.

The important clue is chronology. A family relationship can be repeated until everyone accepts it, but dates allow Julia to check the account. The letters challenge the genealogy she inherited; they do not alone establish who the present-day “Ethel” really is.

4. Mick Denies Knowing Someone the Letters Connect to Him

The correspondence identifies Celia as Mick’s fiancée. When Julia asks him about Celia, he denies knowing anyone by that name.

This is a concrete contradiction. Julia has moved beyond deciding whether someone seems nervous or whether a noise sounds supernatural: she can compare a statement with a written record.

The denial should shift attention toward Mick’s knowledge of the household’s past. It does not prove every part of the haunting scheme, but it gives Julia a strong reason to distrust his account.

5. Archie Is the Cloaked Figure Caroline Encounters

In the historical timeline, Caroline encounters a cloaked figure in the woods and discovers that it is Archie. He brings news of Hitty’s arrest.

The revelation about Hitty supplies an immediate reason to focus elsewhere. Knowing Archie’s eventual identity as the Night Reaper makes his appearance worth reconsidering.

This is foreshadowing rather than conclusive evidence: being in the woods does not establish guilt. Its significance is that a familiar husband receives less scrutiny than an unknown figure would.

What to Watch for on a Reread

My reading is that the strongest clues ask readers to separate an observation from its explanation. A name is spoken; someone explains it as confusion. A place is forbidden; someone explains it through a ghost story.

For a reread, try tracking two questions: what does Julia actually know, and who supplied the explanation she accepts? That distinction makes the investigation more interesting without requiring another retelling of the final confrontation.

Which detail first made you question the story Julia had been told?

Planning a reread? Find The Witch on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow us on Instagram and Facebook